About Professions Australia
Branches & NSWCOP
Policy Material
Knowledge Network
Alerts and Newsletters
Membership Information
Office & Contacts
Search
Member Login
Logout
Home
Constitution
Young Professionals
Ethics Resource Centre
History
Vision and Role
Board
Committees
Media, Speeches
Professional of the Year Award
Archives
NSWCOP
Victoria
Queensland
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
ACT
Competition Policy
Insurance
Higher Education
Other
Knowledge Base Sample
Knowledge Base
Knowledge People
Knowledge Talk
Submit to Knowledge Base
Submit to Knowledge People
Alerts and News Sample
Alerts
Newsletters
Alerts and News Subscription
Criteria
Membership Rates
Member Associations
Knowledge Base Manual
Definition of a Profession
Knowledge Base White Papers
Value Statement
Apply to join
Constitution continued
Participant reports Roundtable Nov 2003
Latest Newsletter
Bankruptcy legislation
What's New
Ethics Action Plan
Definition of a Profession
Codes of Ethics
Ethics Education
Ethics Forum
Related Sites
Reading
Ethics Case Studies
Ethics Research
Competition Policy Submission (1998)
Submission to Economics References Committee (May 2002)
Structured Settlements - Why support them through tax reform (May 2001)
Submission to the Review of the Law of Negligence (August 2002)
Media Release: Professions want broader indemnity agenda (June 2002)
Policy on Risk Management (November 1997)
AGM 2001 Presidents Address
Professional Liability - A fair go for all - 1998
The Professions, Public Interest and Competition Policy (2000)
Australia's Professional Services under threat 1997
National Competition policy & the professions 1997
Dealing with risk. Managing expectations 1996
GM 2002 Presidents Speech
AGM 2002 Presidents Address
Ipp Media Release
Professional Indemnity Insurance Crisis - media Release
AGM President Address 1999
Submission to SCAG-MINCO 9 Dec 2002
John Castles CV
Barry Grear CV
David Thomson CV
Victorian market failure in Professional Indemnity insurance
Coonan's view a shock to professionals
Peak body urges liability cap
Liability decision rouses anger
Proportionate liability is not Holy Grail
Government position appears to be shifting
Professions urge ministers to act now
TPA 'undermines capping'
Market 'too small and too much trouble'
PI market failure needs a package solution
Call for national cap on lawyers' liability
Policy on Professional Self-Regulation (1990)
Role and Duties of an Expert Witness in Litigation (1998)
Alert No 107 (29 May 03)
Alert No 107 Attach 0ne
Alert No 107 Attach Two
Alert No 107 Attach three- Implementation paper
Alert No 107 Attach Four
Paul Meiklejohn
Monica Persson
Contacts
Objectives
Professional Standards Legislation
Events
NSWCOP Newsletters
Nelson reforms miss the main point, say professions
NSW PSC June Seminar
Vic CPA professional indemnity seminar, 28 July 2003
John Hand Brisbane PI Paper, 30 July 2003
Brisbane ICAA PI paper
Professions Australia learns lessons on political campaigns
Ana Govan (information technology)
Brigette Hall (minerals)
Nikki Brennan (architecture)
Nina Quinn (audiology)
Luke Fraser (construction)
Philippa Thomson (dentistry)
Kate West (engineering)
Professionalism, competition policy and the public interest: Issues paper (2003)
Senate TPA inquiry briefing notes March 2004
Insurance Contracts Act review key documents
ACCC insurance market pricing reviews
Senator Coonan website
Insurance Council website
Letter to Coonan on timing July 2003
Letter to Ministers on timing March 2004
Letter to Ministers against contracting out (March 2004)
Update 12 March 2004
Senate Committee inquiry into Trade Practices Act amendments
AGM 2003 Presidents Address
Ordinary Meeting November 2003 Presidents Address
Comments on Hobart Insurance Ministers meeting Feb 2004
February 2004 professional indemnity surveys
Higher Education letters 25 Sep 2003
Higher Ed media 8 October 2003
Higher Ed letter 6 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letters 26 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letter 30 September 03
Higher Education AFR Op Ed piece 13 October 03
National Competition Policy Review - PA Submission (2004)
Announcement of 2004 Professional of the Year
Examples of Member Codes
Code Principles
Guide for Professionals - Key Messages to be communicated on Liability Reform
[Tip: the points below are a summary of the position that has been adopted by your professional body on what needs to be done, and why, to address the problems in the market for professional indemnity insurance. Whilst we are looking to deliver a consistent message to parliamentarians Australia-wide on this issue, remember to personalise your message. In talking to your local Member of Parliament, talk about your experiences as a resident and as a member of the local business community. But remember to emphasise the benefits to the consumer!]
What this is about:
As with public liability and medical indemnity insurance, professionals and tradespeople are also facing a serious and accelerating market failure in insurance. Market failure means the inability of professionals to obtain adequate, affordable (and, in some cases, any) professional indemnity (PI) insurance for the full range of services they provide.
Many are affected: engineers, architects, lawyers, accountants, actuaries, audiologists, environmental services, vets, electricians, plumbers etc.
The flip-side of market failure in PI insurance is that consumers will not be able to get the services they need or will be unable to get services backed by insurance.
What has caused market failure?
Problems with insurance generally (September 11, HIH collapse etc), combined with lack of profitability of PI insurance in particular, has seen the number of insurers collapse to a mere handful in the past 2 years.
Meanwhile, professionals face ever-increasing risk due to the litigiousness of our community (looking for someone to blame in the event things go wrong).
Australia a small market, but is seen as high risk and hence is unattractive to overseas insurers/reinsurers. (Historically Australia generates 2% of global premiums, 4% of global payouts.)
Implications for consumers:
- In the event of something going wrong there will be no-one to sue
- Consumers won’t be able to access professional services as these are being withdrawn/restricted – includes many vital services (e.g. pre-purchase home inspections, asbestos removal, audits of superannuation funds etc)
- Consumers will lose the security of being able to deal with properly insured professionals and tradespeople as more service providers "go bare" (have no insurance).
Implications for professionals:
- Professionals can’t get adequate, affordable (or, in some cases, any) insurance so are withdrawing from higher risk services
- Some are leaving the professions altogether
- Professional associations forced to look at members’ insurance requirements – some with mandatory insurance requirements forced to reduce requirements; some considering abandoning compulsory insurance altogether due to market problems
What is being done?
Insurance Ministers (Federal, State and Territory) recognise there is a serious problem. Ministers are working on three essential reforms: Professional Standards Legislation (PSL), Proportionate Liability (PL) – both need to be introduced by all State and Territory Governments – plus changes to the Federal Trade Practices Act to give full effect to State/Territory PSL & PL.
PSL + PL (+ TPA changes) = Professions will be insurable & CONSUMERS protected