Proportionate liability is not Holy Grail
Date: 13/03/2003
Professionals throughout the country will welcome the assurance by the Assistant Treasurer, Senator Helen Coonan (AFR, Letters, March 11), that the federal government is prepared to amend the Trade Practices Act to facilitate state and territory professional standards legislation, including the capping of liability.
I must take issue, however, with Senator Coonan's claim that achievement of proportionate liability was the Holy Grail for professionals for 30 years. This is not the case. Only a minority of cases involve multiple defendants.
It also fails to recognise that the professional indemnity insurance market has collapsed in the past two years, with spiralling premiums, rising excesses and widening exemptions, and that it requires significant reforms.
Professional bodies believe this market failure can only be overcome by a combination of proportionate liability and professional standards legislation, involving mandatory insurance to protect consumers and a regime of risk management and disciplinary procedures to reduce the incidence of claims.
The actuaries Trowbridge Deloitte advise that capping will give insurers more certainty about the potential size of claims and their average size. According to Trowbridge, this should lead to premium reductions of 10 per cent to 20 per cent for smaller firms.
This is supported by the CEO of QBE Insurance, Frank O'Halloran, who said in a recent interview (SBS, March 7) that professional liability premiums would rise this year by 50 per cent to 60 per cent with increased deductibles and some professionals unable to get cover. He added that, without capping on professional indemnity, premiums would continue to spiral.
John Castles,
President, Professions Australia,
Canberra, ACT.