Professions Australia - A national organisation of professional associations
About Professions Australia
Branches & NSWCOP
Policy Material
Knowledge Network
Alerts and Newsletters
Membership Information
Office & Contacts
Search
Member Login
Logout
Home
Constitution
Young Professionals
Ethics Resource Centre
History
Vision and Role
Board
Committees
Media, Speeches
Professional of the Year Award
Archives
NSWCOP
Victoria
Queensland
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
ACT
Competition Policy
Insurance
Higher Education
Other
Knowledge Base Sample
Knowledge Base
Knowledge People
Knowledge Talk
Submit to Knowledge Base
Submit to Knowledge People
Alerts and News Sample
Alerts
Newsletters
Alerts and News Subscription
Criteria
Membership Rates
Member Associations
Knowledge Base Manual
Definition of a Profession
Knowledge Base White Papers
Value Statement
Apply to join
Constitution continued
Participant reports Roundtable Nov 2003
Latest Newsletter
Bankruptcy legislation
What's New
Ethics Action Plan
Definition of a Profession
Codes of Ethics
Ethics Education
Ethics Forum
Related Sites
Reading
Ethics Case Studies
Ethics Research
Competition Policy Submission (1998)
Submission to Economics References Committee (May 2002)
Structured Settlements - Why support them through tax reform (May 2001)
Submission to the Review of the Law of Negligence (August 2002)
Media Release: Professions want broader indemnity agenda (June 2002)
Policy on Risk Management (November 1997)
AGM 2001 Presidents Address
Professional Liability - A fair go for all - 1998
The Professions, Public Interest and Competition Policy (2000)
Australia's Professional Services under threat 1997
National Competition policy & the professions 1997
Dealing with risk. Managing expectations 1996
GM 2002 Presidents Speech
AGM 2002 Presidents Address
Ipp Media Release
Professional Indemnity Insurance Crisis - media Release
AGM President Address 1999
Submission to SCAG-MINCO 9 Dec 2002
John Castles CV
Barry Grear CV
David Thomson CV
Victorian market failure in Professional Indemnity insurance
Coonan's view a shock to professionals
Peak body urges liability cap
Liability decision rouses anger
Proportionate liability is not Holy Grail
Government position appears to be shifting
Professions urge ministers to act now
TPA 'undermines capping'
Market 'too small and too much trouble'
PI market failure needs a package solution
Call for national cap on lawyers' liability
Policy on Professional Self-Regulation (1990)
Role and Duties of an Expert Witness in Litigation (1998)
Alert No 107 (29 May 03)
Alert No 107 Attach 0ne
Alert No 107 Attach Two
Alert No 107 Attach three- Implementation paper
Alert No 107 Attach Four
Paul Meiklejohn
Monica Persson
Contacts
Objectives
Professional Standards Legislation
Events
NSWCOP Newsletters
Nelson reforms miss the main point, say professions
NSW PSC June Seminar
Vic CPA professional indemnity seminar, 28 July 2003
John Hand Brisbane PI Paper, 30 July 2003
Brisbane ICAA PI paper
Professions Australia learns lessons on political campaigns
Ana Govan (information technology)
Brigette Hall (minerals)
Nikki Brennan (architecture)
Nina Quinn (audiology)
Luke Fraser (construction)
Philippa Thomson (dentistry)
Kate West (engineering)
Professionalism, competition policy and the public interest: Issues paper (2003)
Senate TPA inquiry briefing notes March 2004
Insurance Contracts Act review key documents
ACCC insurance market pricing reviews
Senator Coonan website
Insurance Council website
Letter to Coonan on timing July 2003
Letter to Ministers on timing March 2004
Letter to Ministers against contracting out (March 2004)
Update 12 March 2004
Senate Committee inquiry into Trade Practices Act amendments
AGM 2003 Presidents Address
Ordinary Meeting November 2003 Presidents Address
Comments on Hobart Insurance Ministers meeting Feb 2004
February 2004 professional indemnity surveys
Higher Education letters 25 Sep 2003
Higher Ed media 8 October 2003
Higher Ed letter 6 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letters 26 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letter 30 September 03
Higher Education AFR Op Ed piece 13 October 03
National Competition Policy Review - PA Submission (2004)
Announcement of 2004 Professional of the Year
Examples of Member Codes
Code Principles
Role and Duties of an Expert Witness in Litigation
A member, when called upon to act as an expert witness, shall conduct her/himself in accordance with the 'Role and Duties of the Expert Witness' set out by the Australian Council of Professions, which states:
- The role of the expert witness in litigation is to assist the court in the administration of justice by providing an opinion or factual information based on the expert's competence in a subject which is outside the knowledge, skill or experience of most people. It is founded in the need for a court charged with the resolution of a matter for access to knowledge relevant to the matter which it does not possess of itself.
- It follows that the opinion is only useful if it is based on the expert's area of competence, includes all relevant matters and is impartial and dispassionate. Thus the primary duty of an expert is to the court because of his or her role in the process as defined above. An expert is subject to the normal duty in respect of evidence of fact to be complete, accurate and truthful.
- The expert owes a second duty to the body of knowledge and understanding from which his or her expertise is drawn. This implies recognition of its limitations and the humility which should flow from such recognition, since the outcome of litigation is likely to influence the practical application of such knowledge and understanding in the future. It also implies dealing with the opinions of other competent experts in a respectful manner. It is important to the overall process that the integrity of the processes by which knowledge is acquired and understanding developed should not be degraded. Thus the secondary duty of the expert witness is to the body of knowledge and understanding.
- The expert witness owes a third duty to the party which has sought his or her advice. That duty is to provide the advice in the context of the first and second duties above, which implies that the expert should not be an advocate for a party. This is a tertiary duty.
[Adopted, Annual General Meeting, 25 May 1998]