About Professions Australia
Branches & NSWCOP
Policy Material
Knowledge Network
Alerts and Newsletters
Membership Information
Office & Contacts
Search
Member Login
Logout
Home
Constitution
Young Professionals
Ethics Resource Centre
History
Vision and Role
Board
Committees
Media, Speeches
Professional of the Year Award
Archives
NSWCOP
Victoria
Queensland
Western Australia
South Australia
Tasmania
ACT
Competition Policy
Insurance
Higher Education
Other
Knowledge Base Sample
Knowledge Base
Knowledge People
Knowledge Talk
Submit to Knowledge Base
Submit to Knowledge People
Alerts and News Sample
Alerts
Newsletters
Alerts and News Subscription
Criteria
Membership Rates
Member Associations
Knowledge Base Manual
Definition of a Profession
Knowledge Base White Papers
Value Statement
Apply to join
Constitution continued
Participant reports Roundtable Nov 2003
Latest Newsletter
Bankruptcy legislation
What's New
Ethics Action Plan
Definition of a Profession
Codes of Ethics
Ethics Education
Ethics Forum
Related Sites
Reading
Ethics Case Studies
Ethics Research
Competition Policy Submission (1998)
Submission to Economics References Committee (May 2002)
Structured Settlements - Why support them through tax reform (May 2001)
Submission to the Review of the Law of Negligence (August 2002)
Media Release: Professions want broader indemnity agenda (June 2002)
Policy on Risk Management (November 1997)
AGM 2001 Presidents Address
Professional Liability - A fair go for all - 1998
The Professions, Public Interest and Competition Policy (2000)
Australia's Professional Services under threat 1997
National Competition policy & the professions 1997
Dealing with risk. Managing expectations 1996
GM 2002 Presidents Speech
AGM 2002 Presidents Address
Ipp Media Release
Professional Indemnity Insurance Crisis - media Release
AGM President Address 1999
Submission to SCAG-MINCO 9 Dec 2002
John Castles CV
Barry Grear CV
David Thomson CV
Victorian market failure in Professional Indemnity insurance
Coonan's view a shock to professionals
Peak body urges liability cap
Liability decision rouses anger
Proportionate liability is not Holy Grail
Government position appears to be shifting
Professions urge ministers to act now
TPA 'undermines capping'
Market 'too small and too much trouble'
PI market failure needs a package solution
Call for national cap on lawyers' liability
Policy on Professional Self-Regulation (1990)
Role and Duties of an Expert Witness in Litigation (1998)
Alert No 107 (29 May 03)
Alert No 107 Attach 0ne
Alert No 107 Attach Two
Alert No 107 Attach three- Implementation paper
Alert No 107 Attach Four
Paul Meiklejohn
Monica Persson
Contacts
Objectives
Professional Standards Legislation
Events
NSWCOP Newsletters
Nelson reforms miss the main point, say professions
NSW PSC June Seminar
Vic CPA professional indemnity seminar, 28 July 2003
John Hand Brisbane PI Paper, 30 July 2003
Brisbane ICAA PI paper
Professions Australia learns lessons on political campaigns
Ana Govan (information technology)
Brigette Hall (minerals)
Nikki Brennan (architecture)
Nina Quinn (audiology)
Luke Fraser (construction)
Philippa Thomson (dentistry)
Kate West (engineering)
Professionalism, competition policy and the public interest: Issues paper (2003)
Senate TPA inquiry briefing notes March 2004
Insurance Contracts Act review key documents
ACCC insurance market pricing reviews
Senator Coonan website
Insurance Council website
Letter to Coonan on timing July 2003
Letter to Ministers on timing March 2004
Letter to Ministers against contracting out (March 2004)
Update 12 March 2004
Senate Committee inquiry into Trade Practices Act amendments
AGM 2003 Presidents Address
Ordinary Meeting November 2003 Presidents Address
Comments on Hobart Insurance Ministers meeting Feb 2004
February 2004 professional indemnity surveys
Higher Education letters 25 Sep 2003
Higher Ed media 8 October 2003
Higher Ed letter 6 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letters 26 Nov 2003
Higher Ed letter 30 September 03
Higher Education AFR Op Ed piece 13 October 03
National Competition Policy Review - PA Submission (2004)
Announcement of 2004 Professional of the Year
Examples of Member Codes
Code Principles
Professions Australia made a submission to the Senate Education References Committee inquiry into higher education funding and regulatory legislation. A summary is below and the complete submission is No. 396 on the inquiry website.
Professions Australia (PA) believes that the basic objective of professional education should be to ensure a supply of qualified professionals to serve the community across Australia. This objective focuses sharply on outcomes – how the education system impacts upon the community.
The current debate on higher education has focused too sharply on the ‘input’ side – financing, fees, allocation of places and related issues – to the detriment of outcomes.
Diversity of university mission (a key aim of the Government’s package) does not guarantee good outcomes. Diversity means catering for the differing needs of the individual communities that universities serve and for the developing needs of the nation.
There is an unspoken assumption in Crossroads and Our universities: Backing Australia’s future that tertiary education is too important to the nation to be left to universities. It is also too important to the nation and to individual communities to be left to government, or to government and universities.
Community influence needs to be institutionalised to ensure community needs for graduates in particular professions are taken into account in higher education decision-making. The same applies at the national level.
This can be done through the proposed Commonwealth Grants Scheme (CGS). PA proposes that university-community consultative councils (U-CCCs) be set up at the national level and at the level of individual universities to feed into CGS decisions.
U-CCCs would channel the views of professional bodies, community groups, state and local governments, and other stakeholders into decision-making about the mix of courses and the funding of universities.
PA proposes that community consultation requirements be written into university corporate governance principles and that effective community consultation be made a condition for increases in funding per student place.
There is an evident need for greater community input into higher education decisions. There are already examples, particularly in ‘small enrolment’ professional courses, where the equitable supply of professionals across Australia is under threat. The PA submission presents evidence from a number of professions.
PA also fears that HECS deregulation may lead to competition between universities on the basis of ‘brand imaging’, predatory pricing to drive smaller universities out of some professional streams, and course mixes that do not reflect community needs. PA doubts that price signals alone, such as holding down HECS premiums on nursing and teaching, will channel students into ‘national priority’ streams.
PA believes that improving student: staff ratios can greatly improve the capacity of universities to produce adequately qualified professionals, along with mentoring and accreditation through professional associations. Mentoring also supports the inculcation of appropriate ethical standards in professional graduates.
There is scope for collaboration between institutions, provided it is done to produce better outcomes and not just to save money.
Go to complete submission. (Look for No. 396)